EISA

2026 journal of african elections v25n1 front cover eisa.pdf transparent democratic governance in africa

Vote Buying in Africa: Comparisons Regarding Law and Practice

Vote buying remains a key challenge to democratic elections across Africa, as it does elsewhere. This article provides an overview of the concept of vote buying and its relationship to other phenomena, such as clientelism and campaign promises. The article also reviews the legislative provisions against vote buying across sub-Saharan Africa, noting that vote buying is effectively prohibited everywhere on the continent and is often connected with serious criminal sanctions. Furthermore, the article shows that vote buying remains a common problem in elections across many African countries. As illustrations, it explores the experiences of recent elections in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. Sanctions are seldom imposed, which means the deterrent effect of any sanctions provided for in law is minimised. Popular attitudes toward vote buying, as reported by various surveys, are studied. The results reveal a complex set of views, which may vary significantly across countries and within one country over time. The article concludes that the long-term solution to this challenge appears to be economic development, which would effectively remove the demand side of vote buying; however, there is no single way to eliminate vote buying in the short term.

2025 journal of african elections v24n1 eisa transparent democratic governance in africa

Fake News, Election-Related Disinformation Laws, and Citizen’s Rights in African Political Ecology

This article builds on innovative methodologies that social scientists employ to interrogate election-related disinformation. The paper analyses the roles of regulatory bodies, law enforcement agencies, and technology platforms in halting the spread of disinformation, stressing how these entities can protect the rights of citizens while ensuring the credibility and transparency of electoral processes. The Actor, Behaviour, Content, Degree, and Effect (ABCDE) framework is employed along with a systematic review of literature. The paper identifies key areas of knowledge that African researchers can prioritise in relation to content regulation, human rights protection, and the channels through which election-related disinformation is disseminated. A multi-sectoral and multi-stakeholder approach is proposed to combat disinformation. The article affirms that policies governing the digital sphere in Africa should be tailored to the continent’s unique contexts, constraints, and conditions so that African countries can benefit fully from the information age.